| Tools | Close Tool Window |
| siRNA Target Designer - Version 1.51 | Print Page |
The siRNA Target Designer analyzes an input sequence and find regions within that sequence which fit the siRNA Target Design Parameters. Each siRNA target region, its type (16), length, percent GC, and location relative to the input sequence, is displayed along with the oligonucleotide sequences needed to generate that siRNA in one of Promega's of DNA-directed RNA Interference systems:
The context of each of the potential siRNAs found within the input sequence is displayed near the bottom of the output. Clicking on a displayed siRNA sequence will launch a new browser window with a BLAST search of that sequence against the entire Genebank database allowing users to evaluate the expected specificity of that sequence (15).
The siRNA Target Designer is copyrighted by Promega Corporation. 2003. All Rights Reserved
To use the siRNA Target Designer, first click on the Find Targets link above. Follow these steps to generate target regions for your sequence.
Every Type Ia (and type Ib if select) siRNA (16) from your sequence which also starts with a G (to allow initiation with the U6 promoter or T7 RNA Polymerase) will be displayed along with the oligonucleotides needed to produce that siRNA with the system selected.
We recommend that the effects of each siRNA be compared to those of a mock siRNA that has the same sequence composition as the active siRNA but having a sequence which is scrambled relative to the siRNA sequence (4). After generating targets, click on the Scramble button to generate three choices of scrambled sequences for each siRNA. It is recommended that you analyze each with a BLAST search and choose the one that has least sequence identity with other genes in your organism of interest. Note that mismatches near the center of the siRNA are much more effective at disrupting the RNAi effect than mismatches near the ends (5). If none of the three sequences offered is acceptable, you may generate as many more scrambled sequences as desired.
When possible, the siRNA Designer will return Type Ia, and Type Ib if selected, siRNAs (16). Ui-Tei et al (2004) have shown that 38 out of 39 Type Ia siRNAs reduced target gene expression on the protein level by 70% or more. In addition the siRNA selection rules developed by Kumiko et al fit very well with other recent siRNA selection parameters developed in other labs (9, 11, 14).
Type Ia siRNAs have the following characteristics:
All of Promega's systems use promoters which initiate transcription most efficiently on a G, so the siRNA designer will only choose siRNAs which have a 5' G.
siRNAs which are the opposite of three rules listed above (Start with A or U, end either G or C, 5 of last 7 bases are G or C) are Type III. Type III siRNAs do not show significant RNAi effects.
All siRNAs which do not fit the definitions of Type I or Type III are Type II. Type II siRNAs may or may not have significant RNAi effects.
Only those systems which express hairpin siRNAs can be used to generate Type I siRNAs. Systems in which each RNA strand must be transcribed individually must have a G at each 5' terminus and thus can not be Type I. These siRNAs are ranked by free energy of the 5' antisense region.
Additional parameters used:
Several recent papers(9, 11, 14) have shown that siRNA efficacy is correlated with the free energy of the 5' antisense region. The average free energy (delta G) of the 5 5' bases of the antisense strand is calculated (18) and those siRNAs which the highest free energy, those that are least stable at the 5' antisense end, are shown first. In addition, a chart of the delta G for each position is displayed.
Runs of 4 or more T's (or A's on the other strand) serve as terminator sequences for RNA polymerase III, which is the polymerase which transcribes from the U6 promoter. In addition, it has been reported that regions with a run of any single base should be avoided (5).
In addition to the parameters used by the siRNA Designer, there are a number of additional parameters which can be evaluated for siRNA target design. These include:
siRNAs can potentially affect non-target sequences to which they have sufficient homology. This effect can be reduced by eliminating any sequences which have too much sequence identity with other sequences in the database. For that reason, the siRNA sequence displayed is directly linked to a BLAST search of that sequence. This search is done using an expect value of 1000 and a word size of 7. These are the NCBI-recommended parameters for short sequences. Note that mismatches near the center of the siRNA are much more effective at disrupting the RNAi effect that mismatches near the ends (5).
Elbashir et al (7) recommend choosing siRNAs which are at least 50 to 100 bases downstream of the start codon. This parameter seems to be completely theoretical and is meant to avoid regions in which regulatory proteins might bind. More recent work (17, 19) has not shown any preference for a specific region of the message.
Accessibility of the targeted region of the mRNA to base pairing seems to be important for siRNA efficacy (1, 12, 17) but current mRNA secondary structure prediction algorithms do not appear to be able to predict this accessibility (1, 8, 12). At this time the siRNA Designer does not predict or use any RNA secondary structure information in siRNA design.
The exact sequence of the loop may make a difference to siRNA efficacy. The characteristics which make one sequence better than another are not known, but several different loops have been shown to work (2, 3, 10).
| siRNA Designer Version history | |||
| Version Number | Date available | Systems included | Notes |
| 1.6 | September 2004 |
|
Fixed a bug with siSTRIKE for user designed oligos which started with A, C, or T. |
| 1.51 | July 2004 | Added "Please wait" message while running. | |
| 1.5 | June 2004 |
|
Detect and reject siRNAs which cause runs of 4 or more bases at the siRNA loop junction.
siRNA Design rules of Ui-Tei et al incorporated. Thermodynamic ranking of siRNAs included |
| 1.4 | March 2004 |
|
Thermodynamic ranking of siRNAs included |
| 1.3 | January 2004 |
|
No thermodynamic selection |
| 1.2 | August 2003 |
|
No thermodynamic selection |
| 1.1 | May 2003 |
|
No thermodynamic selection |