Catalog  |  Cart  |  Log In

Applications | Features | LabFacts | FAQs | Cartoons | Site Help

 
Reagents & Solutions
800-356-9526
608-274-4330
enotes@promega.com

RNAi: Shutting Down the Messenger

Described by some as "the most important and exciting breakthrough of the last decade" (1),  RNA Inteference or RNAi is rapidly becoming an important molecular tool for genetic research. Researchers can phenocopy genetic loss-of-function of a specific gene by targeting its mRNA for silencing by RNAi. RNAi experiments  can provide valuable information about gene function without waiting for the time-consuming and laborious creation of genetic knock-outs. RNA inteference is a conserved phenomenon across  evolution–from petunias to nematodes to human cell culture.

This article gives a brief history of RNA Interference studies and discusses the proposed cellular mechanism for siRNA directed interference in mammalian cells.

A Whole New Can of Worms
Mechanism    
siLentGene™ U6 Cassette RNA Interference System 
 
T7 RiboMAX™ Express RNAi System

By Michele Arduengo, Ph.D. and Natalie Betz, Ph.D.
Promega Corporation


A Whole New Can of Worms 

The first hints of RNA silencing of specific genes appeared in 1990 when Rich Jorgensen was attempting to engineer petunias with more intense purple color by introducing exogenous transgenes that unexpectedly resulted in variegated pigmentation (2). The introduced DNA sequences somehow affected the expression of the endogenous loci, and the phenomenon was given the name "co-suppression". However, the phenomenon really sparked interest among biologists studying the roundworm, Caenorhabdits elegans in the mid 1990s.  In a 1995 paper, Guo and Kemphues describe the characterization of par-1,  a gene required for embryonic development in C. elegans (3). Loss of par-1 function results in abnormal cleavage of the early embryos, and embryos arrest development as a mass of cells. To phenocopy the par-1 phenotype, they injected antisense RNA into the gonad (where par-1 is expressed) of wildtype roundworms and examined the progeny of these worms for the par-1 phenotype. The antisense injections phenocopied par-1 loss of function, but so did the negative control, sense RNA injections!  They write in their paper: "Surprisingly, injection of in vitro synthesized sense RNA...also induced par-1 phenotypes at a high frequency among the progeny of injected worms. It is not clear what accounts for this effect" (2).

The work of Guo and Kemphues to explain the phenomenon was extended in the seminal RNAi paper by Fire et al., which demonstrated that double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) was tenfold more potent at reducing gene expression in C. elegans compared to sense or antisense RNAs alone (4). Indeed Fire and colleagues have induced RNAi by feeding worms bacteria that were engineered to express a specific dsRNA (5), and RNAi has been induced in worms by soaking them in dsRNA (6). Since this work, RNAi has been reported in a variety of organisms including zebrafish, planaria, hydra, fungi, Drosophila and mammalian mouse embryo systems (7–13). These phenomena have been collectively termed RNA silencing and appear to use a common set of proteins and short RNAs. These processes are mechanistically similar, though not identical.

Mechanism

In most mammalian systems, the introduction of longer dsRNAs (>30bp) induces a potent antiviral response that activates a dsRNA-activated protein kinase, PKR, which phosphorylates eIF-2a, inducing a generalized inhibition of translation (14). In addition dsRNA activates the 2´-5´ oligoadenylate polymerase/RNase L system and represses IkB, which can induce cell death via apoptosis.  Therefore, it was welcome news when Tuschl and coworkers and Fire and colleagues showed that chemically synthesized short interfering RNAs (siRNAs) could induce specific gene silencing in a wide range of mammalian cell lines without causing the generalized decrease in global protein synthesis and nonspecific mRNA degradation observed with the longer dsRNAs (15,16).

RNAi using short dsRNAs occurs through a multistep process. The dsRNA is recognized by an RNase III family member (e.g., Dicer in Drosophila) and is cleaved into siRNAs of 21–23 nucleotides (17–19). In the next step, the siRNAs are incorporated into an RNAi targeting complex known as RISC (RNA-induced silencing complex), which targets mRNAs that are homologous to the integral siRNA of the complex (18,19). The target mRNA is cleaved in the center of the region complementary to the siRNA (17), with the net result of rapid degradation of the target mRNA and a decrease in protein expression. The most potent siRNA duplexes are 21 nucleotides long, comprising a 19bp sequence with a 2-uridine 3´ overhang at each end (17).

siLentGene™-2 U6 Cassette RNA Interference System: For RNAi in Mammalian Systems

Since the discovery of the RNAi phenomenon, researchers have been interested in using it to examine the function of specific genes. Several tools exist for performing RNAi experiments including in vitro synthesized siRNAs and vector-based systems for introducing siRNAs into cells. However, these tools are either expensive or laborious. Only very limited guidelines exist for selecting the precise target sequence for RNAi experiments, and there is no guarantee that any given 21 nucleotide sequence will result in gene expression knock out or knock down when it is introduced into a cell. Therefore, three to five targets must be tried for each gene targeted, which can be expensive if synthetic RNA oligos are ordered and laborious if the RNA is generated from a vector-based system.

The siLentGene™ U6 Cassette RNA Interference System (20) is a DNA cassette-based approach for creating siRNA expression constructs for direct delivery into cells in a rapid and cost-effective manner. The primer-dependent, PCR-based system precisely places selected mRNA sequences under the control of an U6 promoter and terminator. The PCR products are directly transfected into cells, eliminating the need to laboriously clone each one.  Relatively simple promoter and terminator sequences direct the production of large amounts of siRNA by the endogenous U6 polymerase of the transfected cells. The siLentGene™ System is fast and inexpensive and provides a convenient approach for rapidly screening and determining the efficacy of different siRNAs.

T7 RiboMAX™ Express RNAi System: For RNAi in Non-Mammalian Systems

The T7 RiboMAX™ Express RNAi System (21) is an in vitro transcription system designed for the production of milligram amounts of dsRNA in a short amount of time. The dsRNA is free of protein and other contaminants and is suitable for use in RNA interference (RNAi) in non-mammalian cells. The system is designed for the synthesis of dsRNA molecules of 200bp and larger and can be used with plasmid or PCR templates. Using this system, two complementary RNA strands are synthesized by DNA templates supplied by the user. The resulting RNA strands are annealed after the transcription reaction to form dsRNA. Any remaining single-stranded RNA and DNA are removed with a nuclease digestion step. The dsRNA is purified by alcohol precipitation and can be introduced into the organism of choice for RNAi analysis.

For a more detailed review of RNAi please see 
Betz, N. (2003) RNAi: RNA Interference. Promega Notes 83, 33–36.

Special Note: The serial installments of "Prions: The Unfolding Story of a Good Protein Gone Bad" will resume with the next issue of Promega eNotes.

References  

  1. 2002. MIT helps make RNA inteference "breakthrough of the year". MITNews http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/nr/2002/rnai.html (accessed April 2, 2003).
  2. Jorgensen, R. (1990) Trends Biotechnol. 8, 340–44.
  3. Guo, S. and Kemphues K.J. (1995) Cell 81, 611–20.
  4. Fire, A., Xu, S., Montgomery, M.K., Kostas, S.A., Driver, S.E., and Mello, C.C. (1998) Nature 391, 103-12.
  5. Timmons, L. and Fire, A. (1998) Nature 391, 806–11.
  6. Tabara, H., Grishok, A. and Mello, C.C. (1998) RNAi in C. elegans: Soaking in the genome sequence. Science 282, 2494–97.
  7. Wargelius, A., Ellingsen, S. and Fjose, A. (1999) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 263, 156–161.
  8. Sanchez-Alvardo, A. and Newmark, P.A. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 5049–54.
  9. Lohmann, J.U., Endl, I. and Bosch, T.C. (1999) Dev. Biol. 214, 211–14.
  10. Romano, N. and Macino, G. (1992) Mol. Microbiol. 6, 3343–3353.
  11. Misquitta, L. and Paterson, B.M. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 1451–56.
  12. Svobada, P. et al. (2000) Development 127, 4147–56.
  13. Wianny, F. and Zernicka-Goetz, M. (2000) Nat. Cell. Biol. 2, 70–75.
  14. Gil, J. and Esteban, M. (2000) Apoptosis 5, 107–14.
  15. Caplen, N.J. et al. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 9742–47.
  16. Elbashir, S.M. et al. (2001) Nature 411, 494–98.
  17. Elbashir, S.M., Lendeckel, W. and Tuschl, T. (2001) Genes and Dev. 15, 188–200.
  18. Hammond, S.M. et al. (2000) Nature 404, 293–96.
  19. Bernstein, E. et al. (2000) Nature 409, 363–66.
  20. siLentGene™-2 U6 Cassette RNA Interference System Technical Manual #TM247, Promega Corporation.
  21. T7 RiboMAX™ Express RNAi System Technical Bulletin #TB316, Promega Corporation.
Products may be covered by pending or issued patents or may have certain limitations on use. Please visit our patent and trademark web page for more information.
RiboMAX and siLentGene are trademarks of Promega Corporation.

 

 

E-mail This Page
Printable Version

The Flash Player Plugin is required for your browser to view this animation (more information).